The Michael Jackson Biopic Just Shattered Box Office Records With $217 Million — But Critics Hate It

Hollywood loves a good paradox, and the Michael Jackson biopic has delivered one for the ages. The film has stormed the global box office, raking in a staggering $217 million worldwide in its opening stretch — smashing records and proving that the King of Pop's cultural gravity is as powerful as ever. But here's the twist: critics can't stand it.

The reviews have been brutal. Major publications have called it shallow, sanitized, and more interested in spectacle than truth. And yet, audiences are filling theaters at a rate that would make most franchise blockbusters jealous. So what's going on? How can a film be both a critical failure and a commercial juggernaut?

The Numbers Don't Lie

Let's start with what's undeniable: the box office performance is extraordinary. $217 million globally puts this biopic in rare company. For context, the Freddie Mercury biopic "Bohemian Rhapsody" — which went on to earn nearly $1 billion worldwide — opened to $141 million globally back in 2018. The Michael Jackson film has already eclipsed that by a wide margin.

Domestically, the film pulled in an estimated $85 million in its first weekend, making it the biggest opening for a music biopic in history. International markets have been even more enthusiastic, with particularly strong showings in Japan, the UK, Brazil, and South Korea — all markets where Jackson's music remains deeply embedded in popular culture.

The film's success isn't limited to casual moviegoers either. IMAX screenings have been selling out, and premium format showings are commanding higher-than-average ticket prices. People aren't just watching this movie — they're treating it as an event.

What Critics Are Saying

The critical reception, however, has been a different story entirely. The film currently sits at a dismal score on major review aggregators, with critics describing it as a "greatest hits montage" that fails to grapple with Jackson's complicated legacy.

The most common complaint is that the film is too reverential. It treats Jackson as a mythic figure rather than a human being, glossing over the controversies, legal battles, and personal struggles that defined the latter part of his life. Critics argue that by avoiding the difficult questions, the film ultimately says nothing meaningful about one of the most complex figures in entertainment history.

Others have pointed to the runtime — the film clocks in at nearly two and a half hours — as excessive for a narrative that covers well-trodden ground. "We've seen this story told better in documentaries," wrote one reviewer. "The biopic format adds spectacle but subtracts depth."

The lead performance has received more mixed reviews, with some praising the actor's physical transformation and dance sequences while others find the portrayal too imitative — a tribute act rather than a genuine character study.

Why Audiences Don't Care About Reviews

Here's the thing critics often miss: people don't go to music biopics for nuanced character studies. They go for the music, the spectacle, and the nostalgia. And on those fronts, the Michael Jackson biopic delivers in spades.

The concert sequences are reportedly spectacular, featuring meticulous recreations of Jackson's most iconic performances — from the Motown 25 debut of the moonwalk to the massive stadium tours of the late 1990s. For fans who never got to see Jackson perform live, these sequences alone are worth the price of admission.

There's also a generational factor at play. Jackson died in 2009, meaning an entire generation of young adults has grown up knowing his music but never experiencing him as a living cultural force. The biopic is introducing these younger audiences to Jackson's story in a way that streaming his music catalog simply can't match.

Social media has amplified the effect. TikTok is flooded with reaction videos, dance recreations, and emotional responses to the film. The hashtag associated with the movie has generated billions of views, creating a feedback loop where social media buzz drives ticket sales, which generates more social media buzz.

The Biopic Boom Shows No Signs of Slowing

The Michael Jackson film's success comes at a time when music biopics are having a genuine moment. "Bohemian Rhapsody" proved the formula could work at blockbuster scale. "Elvis" showed that even younger audiences would show up for a well-made music biopic. "Bob Marley: One Love" demonstrated the global appeal of the genre. And now the Jackson film has raised the ceiling even further.

Studios are paying attention. Reports suggest biopics about several other major artists are in various stages of development, from scripting to casting. The appeal for studios is obvious: built-in audience, recognizable songs, and a narrative structure that practically writes itself.

But there's a risk of oversaturation. If every major artist gets the biopic treatment, audiences may eventually tire of the formula — especially if the films continue to prioritize crowd-pleasing nostalgia over honest storytelling.

The Elephant in the Room

Any discussion of a Michael Jackson project inevitably circles back to the allegations of child sexual abuse that haunted the final decades of his life. The film reportedly addresses these allegations briefly but doesn't dwell on them, a choice that has drawn criticism from advocacy groups and some journalists.

The Jackson estate, which was heavily involved in the film's production, has long denied all allegations. The estate's involvement has led some critics to question whether a truly honest biopic was ever possible under these conditions.

This tension — between honoring an artist's legacy and reckoning with their personal history — is one that the biopic genre has never fully resolved. "Bohemian Rhapsody" faced similar criticism for its handling of Freddie Mercury's personal life, and yet it went on to win four Academy Awards.

Should You Watch It?

If you're a Michael Jackson fan, the answer is an obvious yes. The performance sequences alone make it worth seeing on the biggest screen you can find. The film is a love letter to Jackson's artistry, and on that level, it works beautifully.

If you're looking for a challenging, nuanced portrait of a complicated man, you may want to temper your expectations. This is a celebration, not an investigation. Whether that's a feature or a bug depends entirely on what you're looking for.

Relive the Music

The biopic has sparked a massive resurgence in MJ merchandise and music sales. If the film has you feeling nostalgic, check out the Michael Jackson vinyl collection on Amazon — there's nothing quite like hearing Thriller on wax. For the ultimate home theater experience to watch biopics like this, a 4K home theater projector can turn your living room into a private cinema.

The Bottom Line

The Michael Jackson biopic is a fascinating case study in the disconnect between critics and audiences. It's a film that does exactly what it sets out to do — celebrate the King of Pop's music and legacy — while deliberately avoiding the messier aspects of his story. Critics see that as a failure of courage. Audiences see it as a spectacular night at the movies.

With $217 million already in the bank and strong word-of-mouth driving repeat viewings, this film is on track to become one of the highest-grossing biopics ever made. Love it or hate it, Michael Jackson is still the biggest show in town — even 17 years after his death.

Affiliate Disclaimer: Some links in this article are affiliate links. If you make a purchase through these links, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support The Smart Pick and allows us to continue bringing you quality content.